Back to conversations

Tool 31 · Develop yourself

How does the person closest to me experience me?

A guided 18 to 22 minutes conversation, here in TAIU. The lens is on you, not on them. This exercise makes no judgement about your relationship and gives no verdict on whether it should continue.

GUIDES

You have named it. Now spend some time on it.

Each Guide gives you a clear way to look at one subject in your own time. Choose where to begin. You do not need to work through everything.

Their side

How you are actually landing

Look at how the person closest to you is likely experiencing you, using things that have actually happened.

Where this often ends up: An honest account of how you land, built from what happened rather than what you meant.

It may also end with a clearer view of something, or with nothing that needs doing.

Around twenty minutes

What is mine

The part that is yours

Separate what you can change from what belongs to the two of you together.

Where this often ends up: A short account of what is yours to work on.

It may also end with a clearer view of something, or with nothing that needs doing.

Around thirty minutes

What to do about it

One thing worth changing

Decide what is worth changing here, if anything, and what is worth protecting as it is.

It may also end with a clearer view of something, or with nothing that needs doing.

Around twenty minutes

This Guide is free, like everything else in The Clearing.

You can see what it covers before you begin.

Start this Guide
Two men in their late thirties in the kitchen of a Belfast terraced house on a weekday evening, one washing up and the other unpacking shopping, neither facing the camera

What would they say about last month?

Not the argument version. The fair one. Most people cannot answer it. The difficulty is working it out.

Being badly treated and being a difficult partner are not mutually exclusive.

What you'll look at

  1. 01One ordinary month
  2. 02Things you actually did
  3. 03How you handle disagreement
  4. 04What you think they would say

A note from Mark

Mark Eve, founder of TAIU

Everybody arrives at this one ready to talk about the other person. That is not a criticism. It is just how it goes. About half the time, what they say about the other person is entirely fair. It still does not help them. It is not the part they can do anything about.

So I would take one month. Not the relationship, not the story of the relationship. One month, and what you actually did in it. Who noticed things. Who apologised. Who did the boring administration of two lives.

Read my full view ↓

Then I would ask what they could fairly say about that same month. Not what they said the last time it got heated. The fair version. Most people find that harder than any other question in the exercise, and it is usually where the useful material is.

And I would look as carefully at the person doing too much as at the person doing too little. Over-giving followed by resentment does more quiet damage than most of the things people apologise for.

What you'll get

This will not sort you into a personality type.It will give you answers about your own life that you can test.

  1. 01

    Belief against evidence

  2. 02

    Their fair account

  3. 03

    What deserves protecting

  4. 04

    One change

  5. +

    Your TAIU handover: a summary of what the conversation found, written so you can take it with you.

See everything included ↓
  • 01What you came here with
  • 02The partner you believe you are
  • 03What the last month shows
  • 04Where the two agree
  • 05Where they diverge
  • 06What they might reasonably say
  • 07What you are actually giving
  • 08What it costs you
  • 09The rival reading
  • 10What deserves protecting
  • 11The credible alternative
  • 12What, if anything, should change
  • 13The one change
  • 14What remains unresolved
  • 15Where this goes next

What now?

  1. 01 · Save it

    The partner you believe you are, in your own words.

  2. 02 · Test it

    Change something they would notice without being told what to look for.

See more ↓

What I would do

  1. 01

    Work from one month rather than from the whole relationship. Memory flatters the long view.

  2. 02

    Ask what the other person could fairly say, not what they said when angry.

  3. 03

    Look at over-investment as hard as neglect. Doing everything and resenting it is its own failure.

  4. 04

    Protect what is genuinely working. Most people are better in some parts than they think.

  5. 05

    One change, in your own conduct, visible inside a fortnight.

Test it

  1. 01

    Could you name three specific things you did for them last month? If not, that is the finding.

  2. 02

    Ask whether your version of the last argument would be recognisable to them.

  3. 03

    Check that the change you chose does not depend on anybody else agreeing to it.

The alternative

The expected conclusion is that you are giving less than you should. Sometimes the evidence says the reverse. Plenty of people are over-invested rather than absent: doing everything, taking on the emotional logistics of two people and then resenting the cost quietly. Sometimes what looks like withdrawal is exhaustion from somewhere else entirely and has nothing to do with the relationship. Sometimes conflict avoidance is not kindness but a way of never letting a repair happen. And sometimes the record shows you are broadly the partner you believe yourself to be, and the honest finding is that nothing needs to change.

Think about this

  • What you actually did in the last month, including the dull parts.
  • The last disagreement, and what you did when it ended.
  • What you notice about them, and when you last said so.
  • What you are carrying that they do not know about.
  • The account they could fairly give of the same month.

Take this to Ask Mark

You have done the exercise. Now look again at what it found.

This looks at what you found and helps you understand it. It is not another exercise to repeat.

Take this to Ask Mark →

Go a little further

TRY · 12 MIN

Partner Mirror

TAIU

What you believe you bring and what your partner would probably say.

Try it →
Was this useful?

LEARN · SERVICE

Relationship support

Relate

If the same conversation keeps failing, a third person in the room changes it.

Find out more ↗
Was this useful?

READ · BOOK

The All-or-Nothing Marriage

Eli Finkel

Finkel shows how much modern couples ask of one partner, and why relationships can feel like failures when they are simply carrying more than any single relationship once had to.

Read more ↗
Was this useful?
See all resources →

Recommended by the TAIU community

What helped you?

If you've read, watched, listened to or tried something that helped you think about this differently, we'd like to hear about it.

We review recommendations before sharing them with the community.

Finished the exercise?

What did this uncover?

Tell us whether it helped and what you discovered. It takes less than a minute.

Two people in their thirties in a flat kitchen after eating, one washing up and talking while the other looks at a phone

Next tool

How am I showing up?

If the same conduct appears everywhere

Further thinking

  • The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work

    John Gottman

  • Perceived Partner Responsiveness

    Harry Reis

  • The All-or-Nothing Marriage

    Eli Finkel

See the thinking ↓

Book

The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work

John Gottman

Relevant when the exercise identifies a partner relationship as an area you want to work on.

Article

Perceived Partner Responsiveness

Harry Reis

Reis argues that closeness rests on whether somebody feels understood, valued and cared for by the way you respond to them. It gives you a behavioural test for a quality usually described in feelings.

Book

The All-or-Nothing Marriage

Eli Finkel

Finkel shows how much modern couples ask of one partner, and why relationships can feel like failures when they are simply carrying more than any single relationship once had to.

Article

Self-Expansion in Close Relationships

Arthur Aron

Aron's work explains why relationships often flatten when the two people stop growing rather than when they stop caring. A useful alternative reading when things feel dull rather than wrong.