Talk
How to Make Hard Choices
Ruth Chang
Some choices are difficult because there isn't an objectively correct answer. Chang asks us to consider something different: who do I want to become?
Tool 95 · Develop yourself
A guided 13 to 17 minute conversation, here in TAIU. One word, examined closely, tells you more than a whole values list.
A definition is a working rule, not a virtue.
What would a stranger conclude from what you do?
What you'll explore
A note from Mark

People argue about whether they want more security or more freedom without ever checking that they mean the same thing by the word.
I find it more useful to ask what a stranger would conclude about your definition from watching a month of your life. Not what you'd say. What you'd do.
Sometimes that definition is doing exactly the job you want it to do, and the exercise is just confirming that. That's a real result.
Sometimes it's still running a version written years ago for a different life. Either way, it's worth knowing which one you've got.
What you'll get
01
The working definition
02
The origin
03
What it decides
04
The verdict
+
Your TAIU handover, a portable summary of everything the conversation established.
When you finish
This session works on you rather than one part of your life, so nothing is rated. At the end you are asked, once, which part of your life it touched most. You can answer none.
The conversation writes this for you. Keep the sheet, print it or paste it into My Tree. Nothing from the conversation is stored by TAIU.
What now?
01 · Save it
The word you chose.
02 · Test it
Write your working definition of the word in one sentence and keep it somewhere you will see it.
What I would do
Choose one word rather than a list.
Describe what a stranger would conclude from watching what you do, not from what you say.
Name the origin only where you can actually see it.
Say plainly whether the definition still holds.
Leave the rewrite alone unless one genuinely arrives.
Test it
What does this word actually mean when you use it, based on what you do?
Where did that definition come from?
Would you write the same one today?
The alternative
The usual assumption is that examining a word like this is the first step towards changing it. Often the person looks closely and finds the definition still fits the life they are living, in which case the useful outcome is simply knowing what they meant all along. The reverse also happens. Someone discovers they have been running an old definition of success or family that belonged to a much earlier version of their life, and the word itself was never wrong, only its instructions had gone out of date.
Think about this
Take this to Ask Mark
Interpretation, not another copy-and-paste exercise.
Take this to Ask Mark →What helped you?
If you've read, watched, listened to or tried something that helped you think about this differently, we'd like to hear about it.
We review recommendations before sharing them with the community.
Finished the exercise?
Tell us whether it helped and what you discovered. It takes less than a minute.
Next tool
If you want the wider picture behind this word
Further thinking
How to Make Hard Choices
Ruth Chang
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Leon Festinger
The Righteous Mind
Jonathan Haidt
Talk
Ruth Chang
Some choices are difficult because there isn't an objectively correct answer. Chang asks us to consider something different: who do I want to become?
Article
Leon Festinger
The finding that matters here is not that people feel uncomfortable when belief and behaviour diverge. It is what they do about it. Adjusting the belief is far cheaper than adjusting the conduct, and it happens without anybody noticing. If you have quietly stopped believing something you used to act on, this explains the mechanism.
Book
Jonathan Haidt
Haidt argues that moral judgement arrives first and the reasoning follows, assembled afterwards to defend a position already taken. That is uncomfortable reading if you believe you arrived at your worldview by thinking it through. It is also the single most useful corrective when you sit down to describe what you actually believe, because it makes you look for the origin of a conviction rather than only for the argument supporting it.
Book
Murray Bowen
Bowen's idea of differentiation, staying connected to your family without being governed by it, is the useful frame for most adult family questions.
Book
Edward L. Deci with Richard Flaste
The readable account of self-determination theory, written by the man who spent forty years testing it. The finding that matters here is that rewards and approval reliably change why people do things, and that behaviour which survives without either is telling you something the rest is not. It gives you a usable test rather than a feeling.