Tool 49 · Develop yourself

What now, in the right order?

This exercise gives no legal or financial advice, offers no silver linings, and does not require you to have a plan yet.

Two men in their late thirties waiting apart at a bus stop outside an industrial estate, one holding a folded letter

A guided 18 to 22 minute conversation using ChatGPT. Free, no account, nothing to sign up to.

  1. 01

    Copy

    Take the TAIU prompt.

  2. 02

    Paste

    Open ChatGPT.

  3. 03

    Talk

    One question at a time.

Copies the TAIU prompt. Paste it into ChatGPT.

You don't need ChatGPT Plus. The free version is fine.

What do you actually know, and what have you concluded?

Those two get welded together within a day, and only one of them is evidence.

You do not need a plan this week. You need the money position and an accurate account of what happened.

What you'll explore

  1. 01Where you are in it
  2. 02What was actually said
  3. 03Who else went
  4. 04Your runway

A note from Mark

Mark Eve, founder of TAIU

I would not start with your career. I would start with the money, because everything else is unthinkable until somebody knows how many months they have, and because clear headed decisions are not available to people who are frightened about rent.

Then I would want the facts written down separately from what you have decided the facts mean. Those two get welded together within about a day, and they are not the same thing. Who else went. What was said. What was in writing. What you have inferred from a tone of voice in a meeting you were not really present for.

Read my full view ↓

On the question everybody asks themselves, I will not tell you it says nothing about you. Sometimes it says nothing at all, and where a whole function goes that is straightforwardly true. Sometimes performance and politics and economics are tangled together and you will never get a clean answer. Not knowing is uncomfortable and it is more honest than a comforting story.

And I would not decide anything important yet. Not the career change, not the business, not the move. The first fortnight is the worst possible moment to make a decision you will live with for five years. Stabilise. Then decide.

What you'll get

You won't finish with a personality type.You'll leave with answers you can actually test.

  1. 01

    Facts against interpretation

  2. 02

    The money position

  3. 03

    What it says about you

  4. 04

    What can wait

  5. +

    Your TAIU handover — a portable summary of everything the conversation established.

See everything included ↓
  • 01What you came here with
  • 02What is actually known
  • 03What is interpretation
  • 04What is fear
  • 05The money position
  • 06What this says and does not say about you
  • 07What you are carrying that belongs to the organisation
  • 08What needs deciding this month
  • 09The rival reading
  • 10What deserves protecting
  • 11The credible alternative
  • 12What this exercise cannot decide
  • 13What remains unresolved
  • 14Where this goes next

What now?

  1. 01 · Save it

    The facts, separated from your reading of them.

  2. 02 · Test it

    Work out your runway to the month. Actual numbers.

Explore this further ↓

What I would do

  1. 01

    Deal with the money position before anything else.

  2. 02

    Write down the facts, then the interpretation, in separate lists.

  3. 03

    Ask what is actually known about why you, if you were selected.

  4. 04

    Do not make a career decision in the first fortnight.

  5. 05

    Tell somebody. Not for advice. Just so it is said.

Test it

  1. 01

    What do you actually know, as opposed to what you have concluded?

  2. 02

    How many months does the money last?

  3. 03

    What genuinely has to be decided in the next four weeks?

The alternative

The expected reading is that this was a judgement on you. The evidence often does not support that, and sometimes it partly does. Both matter. Where a whole function went, the event carries almost no information about the individual, and continuing to treat it as a verdict extends the damage. Where somebody was selected alone and cannot say why, the honest position is that it is unknown, and inventing either a reassuring or a punishing explanation is worse than sitting with the gap. The other common finding is that the identity loss is being felt more sharply than the financial loss, which is worth knowing because they have entirely different remedies.

Think about this

  • What was actually said, and what was in writing.
  • Who else went, and on what basis.
  • How many months the money lasts.
  • What you have decided this means, and whether the evidence supports it.
  • What genuinely has to be decided this month.

Take this to Ask Mark

You've done the exercise. Now challenge what came back.

Interpretation, not another copy-and-paste exercise.

Take this to Ask Mark →

Finished the exercise?

What did this uncover?

Tell us whether it helped and what you discovered. It takes less than a minute.

A woman in her early thirties carrying a tray of seedlings through the potting area of a garden centre

Next tool

What kind of work fits me now

When the position is stable and the next question is real

Further thinking

  • Unemployment Impairs Mental Health

    Karsten Paul and Klaus Moser

  • The Individual Experience of Unemployment

    Connie Wanberg

  • Transitions: Making Sense of Life's Changes

    William Bridges

Explore the thinking ↓

Article

Unemployment Impairs Mental Health

Karsten Paul and Klaus Moser

A meta analysis of 237 studies. The effect is real, it is largely caused by unemployment rather than explained by it, and it reverses on re-employment.

Article

The Individual Experience of Unemployment

Connie Wanberg

What actually predicts getting back to work, and how search intensity, financial pressure and self belief interact. Practical rather than consoling.

Book

Transitions: Making Sense of Life's Changes

William Bridges

Bridges separates change, which is the external event, from transition, which is the slower internal business of letting go of who you were while it happens. His most useful claim is that the empty middle stretch is not a failure to move on. It is the part of the process where the next thing actually gets worked out, and rushing it usually produces a decision you reverse later.

Book

The Psychology of Money

Morgan Housel

Housel's argument is that financial behaviour is mostly not a maths problem. People handle money according to what they lived through, what they saw at home, and what they are frightened of. Read it for the chapters on enough and on wealth being the money you do not spend, which are the two ideas this exercise keeps running into.