TRY · 10 MIN
Define Enough
TAIU
Enough is the number that would let you stop chasing more. Write it down, with the life it buys, so it stops moving.
Tool 58 · Develop yourself
A guided 18 to 22 minutes conversation, here in TAIU. This exercise does not assume money makes people empty. Sometimes the honest answer is that life is better and the freedom should be used.
GUIDES
Each Guide gives you a clear way to look at one subject in your own time. Choose where to begin. You do not need to work through everything.
Before and after
Compare what money was meant to change with what is genuinely different now.
Where this often ends up: A plain account of what changed, what did not and what deserves protecting.
It may also end with a clearer view of something, or with nothing that needs doing.
Around twenty minutes
Beyond survival
Work out what money should make possible now that it is no longer only covering survival.
Where this often ends up: Your own account of what the money is for now, including anything it no longer needs to prove.
It may also end with a clearer view of something, or with nothing that needs doing.
Around thirty minutes
The finishing line
Decide what you can stop chasing, what is still worth pursuing and what you would leave exactly as it is.
Where this often ends up: A finishing line in your own words, or your reason for keeping the ambition.
It may also end with a clearer view of something, or with nothing that needs doing.
Around twenty minutes
This Guide is free, like everything else in The Clearing.
You can see what it covers before you begin.
Start this Guide
Whatever it is, it was decided by somebody in a harder position, and it has never been reviewed since.
Arriving can be flat without anything being wrong.
What you'll look at
A note from Mark

I would start by giving the money proper credit. It solved things. It is fashionable to skip past that on the way to a more interesting problem, and it is dishonest. Not being frightened about money is a significant improvement in a life.
Then I would look for the leftovers. Almost everybody who has been short of money keeps something from it. A refusal to spend on a particular thing, a habit of checking, a job held on to long after it was needed. Some of that is good judgement worth protecting. Some of it is a rule written by a person who no longer exists.
The striving question is the real one. If somebody built themselves on getting there, arriving can be strangely flat, not because money is hollow but because the organising purpose has gone. That is a design problem, not a spiritual crisis, and it has practical answers.
And I would ask the people around you. Money changes rooms. Roles shift, expectations shift, and it is usually visible to everybody except the person who earned it.
What you'll get
01
What it solved
02
Old scarcity habits
03
What work is for
04
What to protect
+
Your TAIU handover: a summary of what the conversation found, written so you can take it with you.
When you finish
Your tree is where TAIU keeps a picture of your whole life, in parts like work, money and health.
At the end, the conversation asks how Money feels for you right now, in your own words. It also asks what, if anything, would feel different. Nothing changes on your tree unless you say it changes.
The conversation writes this summary for you. Keep the sheet, print it or paste it into My Tree. Nothing from the conversation is stored by TAIU.
What now?
01 · Save it
What the money solved, and what it did not.
02 · Test it
Spend money once on the thing you still refuse to spend it on. Notice what happens.
What I would do
Say plainly what it solved. It is allowed to be a lot.
Notice which scarcity habits are wisdom and which are simply out of date.
Decide what the work is for now, rather than letting it default.
Ask whether anything has changed for the people closest to you.
Be willing to conclude that nothing needs fixing.
Test it
What did the money actually solve?
What do you still refuse to spend on?
If it could not be lost, what would you stop doing?
The alternative
The expected reading is that success has left something missing. Two alternatives usually produce more. Nothing existential may need fixing at all, and the honest finding is greater freedom that has not yet been used. Or the opposite: continuing to optimise for money may no longer improve anything measurable, and the striving has become a habit rather than a decision, which is a real finding and quite different from emptiness.
Think about this
Take this to Ask Mark
This looks at what you found and helps you understand it. It is not another exercise to repeat.
Take this to Ask Mark →TRY · 10 MIN
TAIU
Enough is the number that would let you stop chasing more. Write it down, with the life it buys, so it stops moving.
LEARN · GUIDE
MoneyHelper
Impartial and free, which most money advice is not.
What helped you?
If you've read, watched, listened to or tried something that helped you think about this differently, we'd like to hear about it.
We review recommendations before sharing them with the community.
Finished the exercise?
Tell us whether it helped and what you discovered. It takes less than a minute.

Next tool
If the question is what to do with the surplus
Further thinking
Income and emotional well-being: a conflict resolved
Matthew Killingsworth, Daniel Kahneman and Barbara Mellers
The Hedonic Adaptation Prevention Model
Kennon Sheldon and Sonja Lyubomirsky
Spending money on others promotes happiness
Elizabeth Dunn, Lara Aknin and Michael Norton
Article
Matthew Killingsworth, Daniel Kahneman and Barbara Mellers
Two researchers who had published opposite findings sat down together to work out who was right. The answer was both, in different populations: for most people happiness continues to rise with income, while for an unhappy minority it flattens once real hardship is behind them. It is the most honest available answer to the question of whether more money would help, and it refuses to give you a slogan in either direction.
Article
Kennon Sheldon and Sonja Lyubomirsky
Why the best parts of a life stop registering. Adaptation is efficient and it is also why people trade away arrangements that were working, having quietly stopped noticing them. The prevention research is more useful than the treadmill headline: variety and continued attention slow it, and pure acquisition does not.
Article
Elizabeth Dunn, Lara Aknin and Michael Norton
The effect depends far less on the amount than on whether the giving was chosen and whether you can see what it did. That is a useful design constraint. A small, specific, visible commitment does more for the person giving than a larger anonymous one, which is worth knowing before you set up something you will never think about again.
Book
Morgan Housel
Housel's argument is that financial behaviour is mostly not a maths problem. People handle money according to what they lived through, what they saw at home and what they are frightened of. Read it for the chapters on enough and on wealth being the money you do not spend, which are the two ideas this exercise keeps running into.