TRY · 10 MIN
Principles Under Pressure
TAIU
A principle only counts on the day it costs something.
Tests a stated principle against the last time holding it cost something.
Resources
Everything worth your time on the question: What remains when there is nobody to notice, approve or expect anything?
Five things on this subject: one TAIU exercise and four things to read. It opens with The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life by Erving Goffman. Read the first eighty pages.
This page is for going further on your own. If you would rather work the question out with somebody asking, that is the conversation.
Who am I when nobody is watching: talk it throughTRY · 10 MIN
TAIU
A principle only counts on the day it costs something.
Tests a stated principle against the last time holding it cost something.
READ · BOOK
Erving Goffman
Read the first eighty pages. If the exercise concluded you are performing something, he will stop you treating that as a character flaw and start you asking what the performance is for.
Goffman watched ordinary social life the way somebody watches a play, and found that all of us run a front stage and a back stage. The front is not a lie. It is the working version of ourselves that a situation requires. Reading him takes most of the moral charge out of the question, and leaves a far better one behind: which of your performances is worth the effort it costs.
READ · BOOK
Edward L. Deci with Richard Flaste
Worth it if the exercise found that something you care about only feels worthwhile once somebody notices. He explains the mechanism without making you feel corrupt for it.
The readable account of self-determination theory, written by the man who spent forty years testing it. The finding that matters here is that rewards and approval reliably change why people do things, and that behaviour which survives without either is telling you something the rest is not. It gives you a usable test rather than a feeling.
READ · RESEARCH
Leon Festinger
Best for seeing how much of your self-assessment is borrowed from other people.
The original paper, and still the clearest. Festinger's claim is that in the absence of an objective measure we evaluate ourselves against whoever is nearby, and we choose people close enough to us for the comparison to sting. It explains a great deal about why private ambition and public ambition often turn out to be different things, without reducing everything you want to envy.
READ · RESEARCH
Robert Zajonc and the research that followed
Best for accepting that being watched genuinely changes what you do.
Zajonc showed that the mere presence of others improves performance on things we already do well and worsens performance on things we are still learning. It is one of the most replicated effects in social psychology, and it means the difference between your watched self and your unwatched self is partly physiology rather than character. Useful before you accuse yourself of anything.
What helped you?
If you've read, watched, listened to or tried something that helped you think about this differently, we'd like to hear about it.
We review recommendations before sharing them with the community.